<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leo Laporte Blows up at Mike Arrington on Gilmore Gang!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/</link>
	<description>friedman: always supply your comparative advantage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:44:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Chris. They left it unclear after their &#039;part 2&#039; quasi-love fest, that wasn&#039;t a love fest. Mike and Leo genuinely made up but Gilmore wasn&#039;t having any of it. He was understandably upset that Leo shut down &#039;his&#039; show, but took no responsibility for fostering an atmosphere that leads to predictable personal attacks and an overal unfriendly atmosphere. I have really had a difficult time watching/listening to the Gilmore Gang based on the &#039;Cross-fire&#039; atmosphere Gilmore brings with him. Almost like Rush Limbah.  As I said in my Friendfeed comment, Leo doesn&#039;t need that on his network. It is not a good fit for his friendly/collegial network. Gilmore will be best served elsewhere and Leo will be best served without him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Chris. They left it unclear after their &#39;part 2&#39; quasi-love fest, that wasn&#39;t a love fest. Mike and Leo genuinely made up but Gilmore wasn&#39;t having any of it. He was understandably upset that Leo shut down &#39;his&#39; show, but took no responsibility for fostering an atmosphere that leads to predictable personal attacks and an overal unfriendly atmosphere. I have really had a difficult time watching/listening to the Gilmore Gang based on the &#39;Cross-fire&#39; atmosphere Gilmore brings with him. Almost like Rush Limbah.  As I said in my Friendfeed comment, Leo doesn&#39;t need that on his network. It is not a good fit for his friendly/collegial network. Gilmore will be best served elsewhere and Leo will be best served without him.</p>
<p>&#8230;Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Chris. They left it unclear after their &#039;part 2&#039; quasi-love fest, that wasn&#039;t a love fest. Mike and Leo genuinely made up but Gilmore wasn&#039;t having any of it. He was understandably upset that Leo shut down &#039;his&#039; show, but took no responsibility for fostering an atmosphere that leads to predictable personal attacks and an overal unfriendly atmosphere. I have really had a difficult time watching/listening to the Gilmore Gang based on the &#039;Cross-fire&#039; atmosphere Gilmore brings with him. Almost like Rush Limbah.  As I said in my Friendfeed comment, Leo doesn&#039;t need that on his network. It is not a good fit for his friendly/collegial network. Gilmore will be best served elsewhere and Leo will be best served without him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Chris. They left it unclear after their &#39;part 2&#39; quasi-love fest, that wasn&#39;t a love fest. Mike and Leo genuinely made up but Gilmore wasn&#39;t having any of it. He was understandably upset that Leo shut down &#39;his&#39; show, but took no responsibility for fostering an atmosphere that leads to predictable personal attacks and an overal unfriendly atmosphere. I have really had a difficult time watching/listening to the Gilmore Gang based on the &#39;Cross-fire&#39; atmosphere Gilmore brings with him. Almost like Rush Limbah.  As I said in my Friendfeed comment, Leo doesn&#39;t need that on his network. It is not a good fit for his friendly/collegial network. Gilmore will be best served elsewhere and Leo will be best served without him.</p>
<p>&#8230;Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>Leo was saying on tuesday on his live stream that the Gillmor Gang will not be on the TWiT Network.  It would be difficult (and probably awkward too) for him and Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo was saying on tuesday on his live stream that the Gillmor Gang will not be on the TWiT Network.  It would be difficult (and probably awkward too) for him and Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Leo was saying on tuesday on his live stream that the Gillmor Gang will not be on the TWiT Network.  It would be difficult (and probably awkward too) for him and Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo was saying on tuesday on his live stream that the Gillmor Gang will not be on the TWiT Network.  It would be difficult (and probably awkward too) for him and Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>also, after re-reading your comments, i would clarify that in regards to the gillmor gang Steve is the boss - but in regards to techcrunch and techcrunchIT Mike&#039;s the boss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, after re-reading your comments, i would clarify that in regards to the gillmor gang Steve is the boss &#8211; but in regards to techcrunch and techcrunchIT Mike&#39;s the boss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>also, after re-reading your comments, i would clarify that in regards to the gillmor gang Steve is the boss - but in regards to techcrunch and techcrunchIT Mike&#039;s the boss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, after re-reading your comments, i would clarify that in regards to the gillmor gang Steve is the boss &#8211; but in regards to techcrunch and techcrunchIT Mike&#39;s the boss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>Well business partner might be a better choice of words than boss, but Steve is the main contributor to &lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunchit.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;techcrunchit.com&lt;/a&gt; and that site is owned by Mike.  I would guess that Mike hired Steve more as a complimentary figure than a subordinate.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that I&#039;m thinking about it a bit more I would probably call Steve a subcontractor or freelance type that has strong ties to the techcrunch &#039;empire&#039; or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s definitely complicated.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well business partner might be a better choice of words than boss, but Steve is the main contributor to <a href="http://techcrunchit.com" rel="nofollow">techcrunchit.com</a> and that site is owned by Mike.  I would guess that Mike hired Steve more as a complimentary figure than a subordinate.  </p>
<p>Now that I&#39;m thinking about it a bit more I would probably call Steve a subcontractor or freelance type that has strong ties to the techcrunch &#39;empire&#39; or whatever.</p>
<p>It&#39;s definitely complicated.  </p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor" rel="nofollow">http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>Well business partner might be a better choice of words than boss, but Steve is the main contributor to &lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunchit.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;techcrunchit.com&lt;/a&gt; and that site is owned by Mike.  I would guess that Mike hired Steve more as a complimentary figure than a subordinate.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that I&#039;m thinking about it a bit more I would probably call Steve a subcontractor or freelance type that has strong ties to the techcrunch &#039;empire&#039; or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s definitely complicated.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well business partner might be a better choice of words than boss, but Steve is the main contributor to <a href="http://techcrunchit.com" rel="nofollow">techcrunchit.com</a> and that site is owned by Mike.  I would guess that Mike hired Steve more as a complimentary figure than a subordinate.  </p>
<p>Now that I&#39;m thinking about it a bit more I would probably call Steve a subcontractor or freelance type that has strong ties to the techcrunch &#39;empire&#39; or whatever.</p>
<p>It&#39;s definitely complicated.  </p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor" rel="nofollow">http://www.crunchbase.com/person/steve-gillmor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>I note here that in this post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-gang-now-part-of-techcrunch-network/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-ga...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arrignton said that Techcrunch didn&#039;t acquire the show, but are hosting and managing the advertising.  Without something more, that doesn&#039;t/didn&#039;t make Mike, Steve&#039;s boss. It made him a business partner.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there something I&#039;m missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note here that in this post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-gang-now-part-of-techcrunch-network/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-ga.." rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-ga..</a>.</p>
<p>Arrignton said that Techcrunch didn&#39;t acquire the show, but are hosting and managing the advertising.  Without something more, that doesn&#39;t/didn&#39;t make Mike, Steve&#39;s boss. It made him a business partner.  </p>
<p>Is there something I&#39;m missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2602</guid>
		<description>I note here that in this post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-gang-now-part-of-techcrunch-network/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-ga...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arrignton said that Techcrunch didn&#039;t acquire the show, but are hosting and managing the advertising.  Without something more, that doesn&#039;t/didn&#039;t make Mike, Steve&#039;s boss. It made him a business partner.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there something I&#039;m missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note here that in this post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-gang-now-part-of-techcrunch-network/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-ga.." rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/gillmor-ga..</a>.</p>
<p>Arrignton said that Techcrunch didn&#39;t acquire the show, but are hosting and managing the advertising.  Without something more, that doesn&#39;t/didn&#39;t make Mike, Steve&#39;s boss. It made him a business partner.  </p>
<p>Is there something I&#39;m missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>His boss? No Chris I didn&#039;t know that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I knew Techrunch used to host the Gilmore Gang before it switched over to Twit.tv.  In what way is Mike, Steve&#039;s boss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His boss? No Chris I didn&#39;t know that.</p>
<p>I knew Techrunch used to host the Gilmore Gang before it switched over to Twit.tv.  In what way is Mike, Steve&#39;s boss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>His boss? No Chris I didn&#039;t know that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I knew Techcrunch used to host the Gilmore Gang before it switched over to Twit.tv.  In what way is Mike, Steve&#039;s boss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His boss? No Chris I didn&#39;t know that.</p>
<p>I knew Techcrunch used to host the Gilmore Gang before it switched over to Twit.tv.  In what way is Mike, Steve&#39;s boss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>You do know that Mike is Steve&#039;s boss, right?  Well either way good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that Mike is Steve&#39;s boss, right?  Well either way good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleisphere.com/leo-laporte-blows-up-at-mike-arrington-on-gilmore-gang/#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>You do know that Mike is Steve&#039;s boss, right?  Well either way good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that Mike is Steve&#39;s boss, right?  Well either way good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
