Brooklyn Decker Cheers for Andy Roddick at Wimbledon 2009

to whom this maybe conrn
why is there a major like wimbelon us open, frenc open and austrialan open, ever time thre is a final with eithr rafael nalda or roger federer which ever one make the final they must always win, no rafael nadal this year at wimbelon becausse of a n inury, so once again feder make the final he must alwyas win, look at the points in the 5 sets feder 16 and y 14 the point went up and up just so feder can win, did anybody feel bad for poor andy rodick they did not want him to come home with that wimbdeon trophy, they wanted fderer to win just so he can beat pete samprus dump stupid reciord 15 majors, last year rafael won, federer won 5 times before, this year back to federr will we ever get a break from fedeerer, i hope this his is last wimbedeon title no more roger federer, andy roddick should of come hom with this thophy andy almost won, one again andy roddik was cheated of coming home with that wimbelon trophy.

I don't understand your question? Federer and Nadal make the finals because they are the best players and they win their matches. If not, they wouldn't make the final.

As for Andy, if you watched the match I discussed above, the crowd was solidly behind him for the match. There were far, far more cheering going on for Andy than there was for Roger. I, personally, was cheering for Andy all the way, though I was happy for Roger to win too.

I too will be happy if Andy wins a few more slams, he certainly seems to have the potential again, but if Nadal and Federer keep winning, that won't bother me because they'll deserve it.

Even on the woman's side, I really dislike Serina Williams, but I can't begrudge her for winning. She is a very talented player. So, she wins, I'll not like it, but I certainly won't suggest whoever loses to her was cheated out of a trophy. They won't be. Serina is, unfortunatelly, miles ahead of most of the women players out there.